The 1959 Anne Frank Movie Starring Natalie Wood: Runtime Revealed

The 1959 film adaptation of Anne Frank’s diary, titled *The Diary of Anne Frank*, stars Natalie Wood as Anne and is a poignant portrayal of the young Jewish girl’s life in hiding during the Holocaust. Directed by George Stevens, the movie runs for approximately 180 minutes (3 hours), offering a detailed and emotionally charged depiction of Anne’s experiences, her relationships, and her hopes for the future. While the film takes artistic liberties with the source material, it remains a significant cinematic tribute to Anne’s resilience and humanity, capturing the essence of her diary in a compelling and thought-provoking narrative.

Explore related products

Anne Frank - The Whole Story

$26.56

The Diary of Anne Frank

$4.29

The Diary of Anne Frank

$19.99 $34.99

The Diary Of Anne Frank (1959)

$19.99 $34.99

The Diary Of Anne Frank

$0.89

The Diary of Anne Frank

$20.99 $22.14

Movie Duration: The 1959 Anne Frank movie starring Natalie Wood is 170 minutes long

The 1959 film *The Diary of Anne Frank*, starring Natalie Wood, clocks in at 170 minutes, a runtime that places it firmly in the category of epic cinema. This duration is no accident; the film’s length serves a deliberate purpose. By stretching over nearly three hours, it mirrors the protracted, claustrophobic nature of Anne Frank’s two-year confinement in the Secret Annex. Each minute on screen amplifies the tension, fear, and resilience of the characters, allowing the audience to immerse themselves in the emotional weight of the story. This runtime is a commitment, demanding patience from viewers but rewarding it with a deeply nuanced portrayal of one of history’s most poignant narratives.

For those considering watching this film, the 170-minute duration should be factored into your viewing plan. Unlike shorter films that can be enjoyed in a single sitting without much thought, this movie requires preparation. Schedule a time when you can fully engage without interruptions, as the narrative’s pacing is deliberate and its emotional arcs are gradual. Consider it a cinematic event rather than casual entertainment. Pairing it with a brief intermission, as one might in a theatrical setting, can enhance the experience, allowing you to reflect on the story’s unfolding drama before diving back in.

Comparatively, the 170-minute runtime of *The Diary of Anne Frank* stands out when juxtaposed with other biographical or historical dramas of its era. Films like *Lawrence of Arabia* (222 minutes) or *Gone with the Wind* (238 minutes) share a similar epic scale, but Anne Frank’s story is uniquely intimate despite its length. The focus here isn’t on sweeping battle scenes or grand landscapes but on the human spirit confined to a small space. This makes the runtime a study in contrast—how much depth and emotion can be extracted from such limited physical surroundings. It’s a testament to the film’s storytelling that it sustains interest without relying on external spectacle.

Practically speaking, the film’s duration also influences its suitability for different audiences. While the story is historically significant and emotionally resonant, the 170-minute runtime may challenge younger viewers or those with shorter attention spans. For educators or parents, breaking the film into segments could make it more accessible. Watch the first hour one evening, followed by the remaining 70 minutes another day, allowing time for discussion or reflection in between. This approach not only accommodates the film’s length but also deepens engagement with its themes.

Finally, the 170-minute runtime of *The Diary of Anne Frank* is a reminder of cinema’s power to transport and transform. In an age where shorter, faster-paced content dominates, this film stands as a relic of a time when audiences were willing to invest hours in a single story. Its length is not a flaw but a feature, a deliberate choice that elevates the narrative to a level of depth rarely achieved in modern filmmaking. For those willing to commit, the reward is a profound, unforgettable cinematic experience that lingers long after the credits roll.

Cast and Crew: Directed by George Stevens, featuring Natalie Wood, Ed Wynn, and Diane Baker

The 1959 film adaptation of Anne Frank's diary, titled *The Diary of Anne Frank*, is a poignant and meticulously crafted cinematic experience, clocking in at 180 minutes. Directed by the esteemed George Stevens, the film is a testament to his ability to handle sensitive material with both gravitas and nuance. Stevens, known for his work on classics like *Shane* and *Giant*, brought a humanistic touch to this harrowing story, ensuring that Anne’s voice resonated deeply with audiences. His direction balanced the claustrophobia of the Secret Annex with moments of hope and resilience, creating a film that remains emotionally impactful decades later.

At the heart of the film is Natalie Wood, who portrays Anne Frank with a blend of youthful exuberance and mature introspection. Wood, already a seasoned actress at 21, captured Anne’s complexity—her dreams, frustrations, and unwavering spirit. Her performance is a masterclass in subtlety, conveying Anne’s growth from a spirited teenager to a young woman grappling with the horrors of war. Wood’s ability to embody Anne’s inner life is a key reason the film endures as a definitive adaptation of the diary.

Ed Wynn, a veteran of vaudeville and film, delivers a heart-wrenching performance as Albert Dussel, the dentist who shares the Annex with the Franks. Wynn’s portrayal is both comedic and tragic, highlighting the tension between his irritable demeanor and the shared struggle for survival. His character serves as a foil to Anne’s optimism, creating moments of conflict that underscore the psychological strain of confinement. Wynn’s performance adds depth to the ensemble, reminding viewers of the diverse personalities forced together in extraordinary circumstances.

Diane Baker, in one of her earliest roles, shines as Margot Frank, Anne’s older sister. Baker’s understated performance captures Margot’s quiet strength and the unspoken bond between the sisters. Her portrayal contrasts sharply with Wood’s more vibrant Anne, creating a dynamic that reflects the complexities of sibling relationships under extreme duress. Baker’s ability to convey Margot’s inner turmoil without overt drama is a testament to her talent and Stevens’s direction.

Together, Stevens, Wood, Wynn, and Baker created a film that transcends its runtime, offering a profound exploration of humanity in the face of adversity. Stevens’s meticulous attention to detail, from the set design to the pacing, ensures that every moment feels intentional. The cast’s performances, meanwhile, breathe life into Anne’s words, making the film not just a historical document but a deeply personal experience. For anyone seeking to understand the enduring power of Anne Frank’s story, this 1959 adaptation is essential viewing.

Plot Summary: Depicts Anne Frank’s life in hiding during WWII, based on her diary

The 1959 film *The Diary of Anne Frank*, starring Millie Perkins (not Natalie Wood, who was initially considered for the role but did not play Anne), is a poignant adaptation of Anne Frank’s diary, chronicling her two years in hiding during the Holocaust. Clocking in at 180 minutes (3 hours), the film meticulously unfolds the claustrophobic tension, emotional resilience, and human connections within the Secret Annex. Unlike shorter adaptations, its runtime allows for a deep exploration of Anne’s evolving psyche, from her adolescent optimism to her existential despair, mirroring the diary’s raw authenticity. This extended format serves as a deliberate choice to immerse viewers in the temporal and emotional weight of her confinement.

Analytically, the film’s pacing mirrors the diary’s episodic nature, blending mundane routines with moments of profound introspection. Director George Stevens employs long takes and minimal dialogue in key scenes to emphasize the psychological toll of isolation. For instance, the sequence where Anne silently observes a chestnut tree through a window—her only connection to the outside world—lasts nearly five minutes, a deliberate contrast to the film’s dialogue-heavy family conflicts. This structural choice forces viewers to confront the glacial passage of time, a luxury denied to Anne and her companions.

Instructively, educators and historians can leverage the film’s runtime to facilitate deeper engagement with Holocaust studies. Breaking the film into segments—e.g., the first hour focusing on the Franks’ initial adjustment, the second on interpersonal tensions, and the final hour on their discovery—allows for targeted discussions on themes like resilience, betrayal, and hope. Pairing specific scenes with diary entries (e.g., Anne’s June 12, 1942, entry about receiving her diary) provides a comparative lens for students to analyze the adaptation’s fidelity to the source material.

Persuasively, the film’s length is not merely a test of viewer endurance but a moral imperative. By refusing to condense Anne’s story into a digestible runtime, Stevens compels audiences to sit with discomfort, much like the Annex inhabitants. This approach aligns with Anne’s own words: *"I can shake off everything as I write; my sorrows disappear, my courage is reborn."* The film’s duration becomes a form of witness, demanding viewers honor her experience through sustained attention, a small act of solidarity across time.

Comparatively, while the 1959 version is longer than its 2009 miniseries counterpart (5 hours), it prioritizes cinematic intimacy over exhaustive detail. The miniseries delves into broader historical context, whereas the film confines itself to the Annex, amplifying the microcosm of human behavior under extreme duress. This focus makes the 1959 adaptation a more accessible entry point for younger audiences (ages 12+), though parental guidance is advised for scenes depicting Nazi violence and familial strife.

Descriptively, the film’s runtime is a canvas for Shelley Winters’ Oscar-winning portrayal of Petronilla van Daan, whose character arc from petty thief to sacrificial mother unfolds in gradual, heartbreaking strokes. Her 15-minute monologue in the final act, delivered in a single, shadow-drenched take, encapsulates the film’s emotional core. Such moments justify the three-hour commitment, transforming passive viewing into an active act of remembrance. For maximum impact, watch in a distraction-free environment, ideally with a physical copy of Anne’s diary nearby to annotate parallels in real time.

Explore related products

Anne Frank Remembered

$9.99

Anne Frank Remembered

$3.99

The Attic: The Hiding of Anne Frank

$10

The Diary of Anne Frank

$17.9 $34.99

My Daughter Anne Frank

$2.99

Film Noir Guide: 745 Films of the Classic Era, 1940-1959

$31 $39.95

Critical Reception: Won 3 Oscars, praised for emotional depth and historical accuracy

The 1959 film *The Diary of Anne Frank*, starring Millie Perkins (not Natalie Wood, who was initially considered for the role but did not play Anne), stands as a cinematic achievement that transcends its runtime of 170 minutes. Its critical reception underscores a rare balance between emotional resonance and historical fidelity, qualities that earned it three Academy Awards. These Oscars—for Best Cinematography (Black-and-White), Best Art Direction, and Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Shelley Winters)—highlight the film’s technical and performative excellence, but it’s the emotional depth and historical accuracy that cemented its legacy. Critics praised director George Stevens for translating Anne’s intimate diary into a visceral, universally relatable narrative without sacrificing the weight of her historical context.

Analyzing the film’s emotional depth reveals a deliberate pacing that mirrors the claustrophobia and tension of Anne’s confinement. Stevens avoids sensationalism, instead relying on quiet moments—a stolen glance, a whispered argument—to convey the psychological toll of hiding. This approach invites viewers to inhabit the characters’ experiences, making the film’s three-hour runtime feel less like a marathon and more like a shared endurance. The performances, particularly Winters’ portrayal of Mrs. Van Daan, were lauded for their raw authenticity, grounding the story in human emotion rather than melodrama. Critics noted how this emotional honesty bridged the gap between Anne’s personal story and its broader implications for humanity.

Historical accuracy, often a stumbling block for period dramas, became a cornerstone of the film’s acclaim. Stevens consulted with Anne’s father, Otto Frank, and meticulously recreated the Secret Annex using detailed blueprints and photographs. From the set design to the costumes, every element was vetted for authenticity, ensuring the film served as both a tribute and a historical document. This commitment extended to the narrative, which remained faithful to Anne’s diary entries, capturing her youthful optimism, adolescent struggles, and evolving worldview. Critics applauded this approach, arguing that it preserved the integrity of Anne’s voice while making her story accessible to a global audience.

Comparatively, *The Diary of Anne Frank* stands apart from other Holocaust films of its era, which often leaned into spectacle or sentimentality. Its restrained storytelling and focus on everyday life in hiding offered a unique perspective, emphasizing the human cost of persecution over grand historical arcs. This distinction was not lost on reviewers, who noted how the film’s emotional and historical rigor elevated it from a mere adaptation to a cultural touchstone. Its Oscars were not just awards but endorsements of its approach, validating the idea that authenticity and artistry could coexist in cinema.

For modern audiences, the film’s critical reception serves as a guidepost for engaging with historical narratives. Its emotional depth reminds us that the past is not a collection of facts but a tapestry of lived experiences, while its historical accuracy underscores the importance of respecting those experiences. Watching the film today, viewers are encouraged to reflect not just on Anne’s story but on the enduring relevance of her words. In an era of fast-paced media, the film’s deliberate pacing and unwavering commitment to truth offer a rare opportunity to pause, remember, and empathize. Its legacy is a testament to the power of cinema to honor history while stirring the soul.

Historical Context: Released 14 years after Anne Frank’s death, highlighting Holocaust remembrance

The 1959 film *The Diary of Anne Frank*, starring Natalie Wood, emerged during a pivotal moment in Holocaust remembrance. Released just 14 years after Anne Frank’s death in Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, the movie arrived at a time when the world was still grappling with the enormity of the Holocaust. This temporal proximity lent the film a raw, urgent relevance, forcing audiences to confront the recent past rather than relegate it to distant history. The decision to adapt Anne’s diary into a feature film was not merely artistic but deeply political, serving as a cultural touchstone to ensure the atrocities of the Holocaust were neither forgotten nor normalized.

Analytically, the film’s release in 1959 positioned it within a broader post-war narrative of reconstruction and reckoning. The 1950s marked a period of economic recovery and cultural optimism in the West, yet the Holocaust’s shadow lingered. By bringing Anne’s story to the silver screen, the film challenged this era’s tendency to gloss over uncomfortable truths. It acted as a counterbalance to the prevailing narrative of progress, reminding viewers that the Holocaust was not a relic of a bygone era but a recent horror with enduring implications. This timing was deliberate, leveraging the medium of film to embed Anne’s legacy into the collective consciousness.

Instructively, the film’s historical context underscores the importance of timing in memorialization efforts. Fourteen years is neither too soon nor too late—it is a critical juncture where personal memories remain vivid, yet enough time has passed to foster reflection. For educators and historians, this period offers a blueprint for how to approach sensitive historical topics. By situating Anne’s story within its immediate aftermath, the film encourages audiences to connect the past to the present, fostering empathy and critical thinking. Practical tips for educators include pairing screenings with discussions on the Holocaust’s long-term impact and encouraging students to explore how their own societies remember or forget historical traumas.

Persuasively, the film’s release in 1959 highlights the power of art to shape historical memory. In an era before widespread Holocaust education, *The Diary of Anne Frank* became a cultural artifact that humanized the Holocaust for millions. Natalie Wood’s portrayal of Anne brought a personal, relatable face to the tragedy, making it impossible for viewers to remain detached. This emotional connection was instrumental in transforming the Holocaust from an abstract historical event into a deeply personal narrative. By doing so, the film not only honored Anne’s memory but also laid the groundwork for future efforts to commemorate the Holocaust, proving that storytelling can be as powerful as any historical document.

Comparatively, the 1959 film stands apart from later adaptations and memorials due to its temporal proximity to the Holocaust. Unlike works created decades later, it was produced in an era when survivors were still processing their trauma and the world was still reckoning with guilt and complicity. This immediacy imbued the film with a sense of urgency that later interpretations often lack. For instance, while the 2009 miniseries *The Diary of Anne Frank* benefits from modern filmmaking techniques, it cannot replicate the raw emotional impact of a story told so soon after the events. This comparison underscores the unique role the 1959 film played in shaping Holocaust remembrance, serving as both a historical document and a cultural catalyst.

Frequently asked questions